Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Slavic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Slavic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Slavs
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,692,358 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 23.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Slavic |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 32.1% | 46.6% |
| Range | 30.1% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 12.0% |
| Median | 13.9% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |