Tongan vs Burmese Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Burmese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Burmese
10.8%
POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Burmese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,864,002 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,896,901 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Burmese |
Minimum | 5.8% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 19.8% | 37.7% |
Range | 14.1% | 36.2% |
Mean | 10.4% | 9.3% |
Median | 10.1% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Burmese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Macedonian (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Czech (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |