Tohono O'odham vs Jamaican Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Jamaican
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Jamaicans
31.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Jamaican Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,612,665 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 31.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 360,459,370 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 59.0%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 44.3% |
| Range | 92.6% | 42.8% |
| Mean | 41.6% | 17.2% |
| Median | 34.7% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.7% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.5% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.8% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.5% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.9% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Lumbee (31.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 2.3%), Puerto Rican (29.8%, a difference of 3.9%), Kiowa (29.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and Colville (29.0%, a difference of 6.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 28.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.2% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.1% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 33.2% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Turkish (19.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Soviet Union (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Russian (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Panama | 94.0 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.7 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 93.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Slovaks | 92.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | England | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 92.9 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Latvians | 92.7 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Jamaicans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Turks | 92.1 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 92.1 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Soviet Union | 92.0 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Russians | 91.5 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Austrians | 90.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 19.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 88.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 19.6% |