Thai vs Immigrants from Taiwan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Thai
Immigrants from Taiwan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Thais
Immigrants from Taiwan
11.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Immigrants from Taiwan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,276,547 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,199,111 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 4.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Immigrants from Taiwan |
Minimum | 0.97% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 38.0% | 24.4% |
Range | 37.1% | 23.4% |
Mean | 8.0% | 9.2% |
Median | 7.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Thais and Immigrants from Taiwan by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 3.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 4.3%), Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 0.87%), Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (11.0%, a difference of 2.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 9.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |