Swiss vs Dutch Male Poverty
COMPARE
Swiss
Dutch
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Swiss
Dutch
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Dutch Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,423,995 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,017,798 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.330 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.65%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Dutch |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.58% |
| Maximum | 47.0% | 26.3% |
| Range | 45.9% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 8.4% |
| Median | 8.8% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Dutch by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Zimbabwean (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Carpatho Rusyn (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belgium (10.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Irish (10.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Dutch | 96.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Irish | 96.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| English | 96.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.3% |