Soviet Union vs Pima Male Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Pima
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Pima
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
60.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Pima Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,503,005 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,248 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 83.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Pima |
Minimum | 0.80% | 9.2% |
Maximum | 23.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 22.4% | 90.8% |
Mean | 9.1% | 29.7% |
Median | 8.4% | 23.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 37.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 22.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 21.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 20.7% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |