Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Latin America Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,300,584 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,992,515 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.484 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 1.2%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Soviet Union	Immigrants from Latin America
Minimum	2.4%	6.0%
Maximum	49.3%	37.6%
Range	46.8%	31.6%
Mean	18.0%	17.8%
Median	15.9%	18.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.9%	16.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.8%	20.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.9%	4.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.7%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.6%	5.1%

Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latin America by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Jamaican (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Turkish (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Russian (19.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Latvian (19.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Oceania (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (19.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (19.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Austria (19.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.20%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Latvians	92.7 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 19.5%
Jamaicans	92.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 19.5%
Turks	92.1 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| North America	92.1 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 19.5%
Soviet Union	92.0 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 19.5%
Russians	91.5 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 19.5%
Austrians	90.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	89.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 19.6%
Indians (Asian)	88.3 /100 \| #139	Excellent 19.6%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 19.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 19.7%
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%