Soviet Union vs French Canadian Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
French Canadian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
French Canadians
11.7%
POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs French Canadian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,211,905 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.75%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | French Canadian |
Minimum | 0.29% | 0.65% |
Maximum | 22.6% | 31.6% |
Range | 22.3% | 30.9% |
Mean | 9.1% | 13.3% |
Median | 8.3% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and French Canadians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from China (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |