South African vs Pima Family Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Pima
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Pima
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Pima Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,354,069 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.807 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,531,194 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 18.4%, a difference of 123.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Pima |
Minimum | 2.1% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 28.7% | 92.8% |
Mean | 7.0% | 29.5% |
Median | 6.0% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 34.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), French (8.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), Lumbee (17.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |