Somali vs Yup'ik Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
Yup'ik
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Yup'ik
25.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Yup'ik Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,025,014 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 25.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,804,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 26.6%, a difference of 5.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Somali | Yup'ik |
| Minimum | 7.2% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 54.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 47.2% | 97.1% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 36.3% |
| Median | 23.0% | 30.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 42.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 25.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 24.8% |
Demographics Similar to Somalis and Yup'ik by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Shoshone (25.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.95%), Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |