Somali vs Immigrants from China Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
Immigrants from China
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Immigrants from China
14.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Immigrants from China Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,638,192 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,182,579 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 2.9%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Somali | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 34.8% | 30.8% |
Range | 33.5% | 30.3% |
Mean | 14.0% | 14.1% |
Median | 14.6% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.9% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Somalis and Immigrants from China by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Thai (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (14.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Icelander (14.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (14.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Okinawan (14.6%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Malaysian (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Salvadoran (14.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (14.8%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Icelanders | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.9% |