Sioux vs Palestinian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Sioux
Palestinian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Sioux
Palestinians
25.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Palestinian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,148,803 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 25.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,678,574 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 67.2%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 40.9% |
| Range | 97.2% | 39.1% |
| Mean | 43.2% | 16.5% |
| Median | 38.4% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.3% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.8% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 43.5% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.2% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.1% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Sioux by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Yup'ik (25.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Cheyenne (25.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Houma (24.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Crow (26.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and Black/African American (24.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
| Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Canadians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.2% |