Scotch-Irish vs Hungarian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Hungarian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Hungarians
16.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
47.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
47.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Hungarian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,822,758 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,859,251 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 16.5%, a difference of 0.020%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Hungarian |
Minimum | 10.0% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 90.0% | 95.3% |
Mean | 33.9% | 36.7% |
Median | 23.9% | 26.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.8% | 51.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.8% | 37.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.8% | 28.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.6% | 28.5% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Hungarians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (16.5%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (16.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Syria (16.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Hawaiian (16.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Uruguayan (16.4%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Ethiopian (16.5%, a difference of 0.060%), White/Caucasian (16.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Syria (16.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Hawaiian (16.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Uruguayan (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
South Americans | 55.3 /100 | #168 | Average 16.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 53.6 /100 | #169 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.7 /100 | #170 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 51.3 /100 | #171 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Uruguayans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 49.0 /100 | #175 | Average 16.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 48.2 /100 | #176 | Average 16.5% |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Celtics | 40.6 /100 | #184 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 40.4 /100 | #185 | Average 16.6% |
Hmong | 38.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 37.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 37.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.7% |