Romanian vs Czech Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Romanian
Czech
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Romanians
Czechs
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
92.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Czech Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 370,877,474 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,997,416 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.72%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Czech |
Minimum | 9.2% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
Range | 90.8% | 47.0% |
Mean | 27.2% | 15.7% |
Median | 16.2% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.8% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.0% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.8% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Czechs by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Western Asia (12.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Slovene (12.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Mongolian (12.8%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Syrian (12.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North America (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (12.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Fiji (12.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Canada (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 93.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Mongolians | 93.0 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 93.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Romanians | 92.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 92.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Slovenes | 92.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 91.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Czechs | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Syrians | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 89.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 88.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 13.0% |
Serbians | 87.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 13.0% |