Portuguese vs Romanian Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Romanian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Portuguese
Romanians
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Romanian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,939,658 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,713,994 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Portuguese | Romanian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.31% |
Maximum | 36.0% | 58.5% |
Range | 34.3% | 58.2% |
Mean | 11.7% | 13.5% |
Median | 10.5% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 15.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Romanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |