Pima vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Pima
Filipino
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Pima
Filipinos
29.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Filipino Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,516,106 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 29.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,527,529 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 160.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Filipino |
Minimum | 13.1% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 26.4% |
Range | 86.9% | 25.5% |
Mean | 39.2% | 8.4% |
Median | 34.2% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.1% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.6% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.7% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Yuman (28.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%), Immigrants from India (10.8%, a difference of 3.4%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |