Peruvian vs Tsimshian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Peruvian
Tsimshian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Peruvians
Tsimshian
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Peruvian vs Tsimshian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,941,638 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Peruvian | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 40.9% | 27.8% |
| Range | 40.7% | 25.6% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 14.0% |
| Median | 12.5% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Peruvians and Tsimshian by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are French (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |