Peruvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty
COMPARE
Peruvian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Peruvians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Peruvian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,866,213 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Peruvian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 0.066% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 32.8% | 23.0% |
Range | 32.7% | 22.5% |
Mean | 10.6% | 8.4% |
Median | 10.1% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Peruvians and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Okinawan (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Sri Lankan (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |