Pennsylvania German vs Scotch-Irish Poverty
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Scotch-Irish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Scotch-Irish
12.2%
POVERTY
60.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
POVERTY
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Scotch-Irish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,033,089 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,217,294 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.18%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 63.9% |
| Range | 97.6% | 62.1% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 16.7% |
| Median | 11.4% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.6% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans and Scotch-Irish by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Nepal (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Costa Rican (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Fiji (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Ethiopian (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Costa Rican (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
| Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
| Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
| Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |
| Venezuelans | 56.9 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 56.7 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |