Panamanian vs Cherokee Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Panamanian
Cherokee
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Panamanians
Cherokee
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Cherokee Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,759,434 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.073 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,541,023 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.96% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 21.5% | 54.5% |
Range | 20.5% | 51.1% |
Mean | 6.3% | 10.6% |
Median | 5.7% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Cherokee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Colombian (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Cajun (5.6%, a difference of 0.85%), Immigrants from Fiji (5.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and Sudanese (5.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Venezuelan (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South America (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Ghanaian (5.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (5.7%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |