Palestinian vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,096,345 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.067 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,737,092 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 1.5%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Palestinian	Immigrants from Jordan
Minimum	1.2%	2.2%
Maximum	48.5%	46.0%
Range	47.3%	43.9%
Mean	17.4%	19.0%
Median	17.8%	17.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.5%	14.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.8%	22.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.3%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.3%	8.7%

Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Jordan by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Japanese (18.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Uruguayan (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Uruguay (18.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Burmese (18.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Salvadoran (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Sierra Leonean (19.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Guamanian/Chamorro (19.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Ukrainian (19.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Uruguayans	99.5 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 18.8%
Palestinians	99.5 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 18.8%
Japanese	99.5 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	99.4 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 18.9%
Burmese	99.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Armenia	99.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	99.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 18.9%
Croatians	99.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	99.0 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 19.0%
Afghans	99.0 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 19.0%
Romanians	98.9 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 19.0%
Filipinos	98.9 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 19.0%
Haitians	98.9 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 19.0%
Ukrainians	98.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 19.0%
Guamanians/Chamorros	98.8 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 19.0%
Sierra Leoneans	98.7 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 19.0%
Salvadorans	98.4 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	98.4 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	98.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 19.1%