Palestinian vs English Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Palestinian
English
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Palestinians
English
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs English Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,720,256 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,761,562 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | English |
Minimum | 0.56% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 62.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.3% | 97.8% |
Mean | 17.9% | 28.6% |
Median | 14.1% | 17.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 26.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 26.5% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and English by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |