Paiute vs British West Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Paiute
British West Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Paiute
British West Indians
17.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paiute vs British West Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,391,472 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Paiute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,611,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 3.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Paiute | British West Indian |
| Minimum | 5.7% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 34.4% |
| Range | 94.3% | 32.6% |
| Mean | 25.6% | 14.9% |
| Median | 17.8% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.6% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.3% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.0% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Paiute and British West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paiute are Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.59%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |