Osage vs Fijian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Fijian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Osage
Fijians
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Fijian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,772,722 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,925,682 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 4.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Fijian |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 24.4% | 28.8% |
| Range | 23.6% | 28.0% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 13.2% |
| Median | 9.8% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Fijians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.67%), American (9.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |