Okinawan vs Latvian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Okinawan
Latvian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Okinawans
Latvians
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Okinawan vs Latvian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,373,565 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,777,893 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 0.98%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Okinawan | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 6.0% |
Maximum | 39.6% | 90.7% |
Range | 38.0% | 84.7% |
Mean | 17.9% | 24.7% |
Median | 17.5% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 25.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Okinawans and Latvians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |