Norwegian vs Immigrants from South Africa Single Mother Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 509,575,391 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 228,424,231 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.689 and weighted average of 28.3%, a difference of 0.46%.

Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Norwegian	Immigrants from South Africa
Minimum	7.1%	11.1%
Maximum	94.7%	100.0%
Range	87.6%	88.9%
Mean	34.0%	43.6%
Median	31.1%	33.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.6%	28.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	38.9%	55.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.3%	27.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.6%	22.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.5%	22.4%

Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from South Africa by Single Mother Poverty

In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are South American (28.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Austria (28.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (28.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (28.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Chile (28.4%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Western Asia (28.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kuwait (28.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uganda (28.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (28.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Brazilian (28.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Mother Poverty
Venezuelans	94.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	94.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| South Africa	93.2 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	92.7 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	92.7 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Uganda	92.5 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 28.3%
Australians	92.5 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 28.3%
Brazilians	92.4 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Syria	92.4 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 28.3%
Cypriots	92.3 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	92.1 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 28.3%
Colombians	91.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 28.3%
Uruguayans	91.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	91.7 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 28.3%
Kenyans	90.9 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Chile	90.8 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 28.4%
Poles	90.8 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| England	90.5 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 28.4%
South Americans	90.4 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 28.4%
Norwegians	90.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Austria	90.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 28.4%