Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from the Azores Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Immigrants from the Azores
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Immigrants from the Azores
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from the Azores Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,225,965 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,244,959 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Immigrants from the Azores |
Minimum | 6.7% | 0.65% |
Maximum | 24.7% | 25.2% |
Range | 18.0% | 24.5% |
Mean | 15.1% | 12.0% |
Median | 14.4% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 14.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from the Azores by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |