Nicaraguan vs Mexican American Indian Poverty
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Mexican American Indian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Nicaraguans
Mexican American Indians
13.9%
POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Mexican American Indian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,615,173 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,505,642 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 2.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nicaraguan | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 4.2% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 36.5% | 51.0% |
Range | 32.4% | 49.9% |
Mean | 14.7% | 15.9% |
Median | 13.2% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Mexican American Indians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Middle Africa (14.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Salvadoran (14.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Ghanaian (13.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Ecuadorian (14.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and French American Indian (13.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Spanish American Indian (14.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |