Nepalese vs Sudanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Nepalese
Sudanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Nepalese
Sudanese
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Sudanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,106,340 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.17%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nepalese | Sudanese |
Minimum | 4.7% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 31.9% | 40.1% |
Range | 27.2% | 35.9% |
Mean | 13.4% | 14.2% |
Median | 12.1% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 15.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Nepalese and Sudanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |