Native/Alaskan vs Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Lumbee
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Lumbee
24.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Lumbee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,562,202 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565 and weighted average of 24.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 27.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 75.5% | 78.3% |
| Range | 70.0% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 33.7% | 38.6% |
| Median | 30.5% | 35.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.8% | 51.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.2% | 26.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 16.0% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans and Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Apache (23.8%, a difference of 0.86%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.8%, a difference of 0.91%), Kiowa (23.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Dominican (23.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and Black/African American (24.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |