Moroccan vs Japanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Moroccan
Japanese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Moroccans
Japanese
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Japanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,064,228 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,332,708 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.504 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 0.090%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Japanese |
Minimum | 7.0% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 93.0% | 99.0% |
Mean | 26.4% | 23.2% |
Median | 18.1% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 15.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 26.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.8% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.4% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Japanese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Panama (17.9%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |