Mongolian vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Choctaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Choctaw
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Choctaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,546,705 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,568,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 39.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 97.3% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 17.1% | 30.9% |
| Median | 12.5% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 34.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 20.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 20.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Colombian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Osage (16.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |