Mexican American Indian vs Spanish American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Spanish American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Spanish American Indians
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Spanish American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,482,192 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,141,857 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 2.6% | 6.9% |
Maximum | 35.9% | 47.0% |
Range | 33.3% | 40.0% |
Mean | 15.1% | 15.2% |
Median | 13.8% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Spanish American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |