Mexican American Indian vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Luxembourgers
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,250,046 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,903,603 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 36.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 3.6% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 77.1% | 33.3% |
Range | 73.5% | 32.0% |
Mean | 29.2% | 11.9% |
Median | 23.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.3% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.5% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.3% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.1% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 0.58%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.61%), Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |