Marshallese vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Pima
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Pima
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
47.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Pima Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,723,885 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 118.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.00% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 7.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 6.2% | 96.4% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 19.6% |
| Median | 4.9% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Menominee (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Ukraine (5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
| Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
| Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
| Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
| Spanish | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 39.3 /100 | #180 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 38.8 /100 | #181 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 37.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |