Marshallese vs Osage Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Osage
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Osage
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Osage Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,727,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 23.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,495,293 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132 and weighted average of 24.4%, a difference of 4.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Osage |
Minimum | 16.2% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 56.5% | 50.0% |
Range | 40.3% | 39.8% |
Mean | 28.7% | 29.5% |
Median | 25.2% | 30.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.6% | 23.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.8% | 35.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Osage by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.60%), U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.94%), Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and Bangladeshi (24.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |