Malaysian vs Hungarian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Hungarian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Hungarians
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
29.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
34.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Hungarian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,983,530 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 478,217,673 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.810 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 0.69%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Hungarian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.71% |
Maximum | 17.9% | 55.3% |
Range | 16.4% | 54.5% |
Mean | 6.9% | 14.8% |
Median | 5.9% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 19.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Hungarians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from the Azores (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are American (5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Nonimmigrants (5.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Israeli (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and South American Indian (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Spanish | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 39.3 /100 | #180 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 38.8 /100 | #181 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 37.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 5.3% |
Peruvians | 37.6 /100 | #183 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 35.8 /100 | #184 | Fair 5.3% |
Americans | 35.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 5.3% |
Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |