Macedonian vs Laotian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Macedonian
Laotian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Macedonians
Laotians
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Laotian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,236,838 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,726,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Macedonian | Laotian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 61.2% | 35.0% |
Range | 59.1% | 32.7% |
Mean | 14.9% | 14.7% |
Median | 12.8% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 19.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Laotians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Ukrainian (14.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Italy (14.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.33%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Argentina (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |