Luxembourger vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Zimbabwean
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Zimbabweans
14.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,046,176 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,606,248 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.66% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 31.6% |
| Range | 31.4% | 31.0% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 11.9% |
| Median | 12.5% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Zimbabweans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Israel (14.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Danish (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Egyptian (14.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Greek (15.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Lithuanian (15.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (15.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Romania (15.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.5 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.4 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.4 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Danes | 99.4 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Swedes | 99.4 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Paraguayans | 99.4 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.0 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Greeks | 99.0 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.0 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 15.3% |