Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Yup'ik
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Yup'ik
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Yup'ik Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,962,746 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 114.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Yup'ik |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 55.6% |
| Range | 16.3% | 55.1% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 21.5% |
| Median | 6.1% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 30.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 21.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 13.6% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Pima (20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |