Luxembourger vs Tongan Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Tongan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Tongans
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Tongan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,648,044 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,864,002 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Tongan |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 5.8% |
| Maximum | 19.5% | 19.8% |
| Range | 17.9% | 14.1% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 10.4% |
| Median | 6.8% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Tongans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Macedonian (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Czech (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |