Luxembourger vs Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Pima
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Pima
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Pima Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,837,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,516,106 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 29.0%, a difference of 112.9%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Pima |
Minimum | 1.6% | 13.1% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.9% | 86.9% |
Mean | 10.7% | 39.2% |
Median | 10.0% | 34.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 47.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 24.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Australia (13.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Scotland (13.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Yuman (28.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |