Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Taiwan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Immigrants from Taiwan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Immigrants from Taiwan
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Taiwan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 295,998,361 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 6.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Immigrants from Taiwan |
| Minimum | 0.35% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 15.5% | 10.3% |
| Range | 15.1% | 9.3% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 4.1% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Immigrants from Taiwan by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.83%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |