Luxembourger vs Bolivian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Bolivian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Bolivians
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Bolivian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,279,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,491,502 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 4.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Bolivian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.42% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 60.4% |
Range | 48.7% | 60.0% |
Mean | 11.9% | 12.9% |
Median | 10.7% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Bolivians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Russian (13.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from China (13.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |