Lumbee vs Dutch West Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Dutch West Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Dutch West Indians
33.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Dutch West Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,816,335 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 33.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,533,400 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 20.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Dutch West Indian |
Minimum | 6.8% | 18.0% |
Maximum | 80.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 73.8% | 82.0% |
Mean | 39.4% | 42.0% |
Median | 39.3% | 34.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.1% | 27.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.3% | 53.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.2% | 26.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 21.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Dutch West Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Crow (32.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 4.3%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Apache (27.7%, a difference of 0.91%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.96%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |