Lumbee vs Central American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Central American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Central American Indians
23.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Central American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 23.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,040,737 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 18.0%, a difference of 30.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Central American Indian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 65.5% | 94.5% |
Range | 63.6% | 93.2% |
Mean | 28.4% | 26.1% |
Median | 28.6% | 20.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.3% | 37.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 23.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 17.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Central American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pima (23.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.2%), Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Yakama (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |