Lumbee vs American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
American
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Lumbee
Americans
30.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,627 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 30.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,572,763 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 63.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | American |
Minimum | 10.0% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 78.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 68.3% | 96.3% |
Mean | 38.6% | 34.4% |
Median | 35.6% | 26.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.0% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.4% | 36.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 21.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.0% | 21.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 4.1%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Nigerian (18.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and Marshallese (18.7%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |