Lithuanian vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Norwegian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Lithuanians
Norwegians
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,877,620 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 523,024,216 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 4.4%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 75.6% |
| Range | 99.8% | 72.8% |
| Mean | 19.4% | 14.2% |
| Median | 13.9% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.1% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Norwegians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Russian (13.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.48%), Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.97%), Danish (13.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Cypriot (13.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and Okinawan (13.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |