Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from South Central Asia
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,091,398 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,235,402 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.481 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 6.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 26.1% |
| Range | 98.8% | 24.8% |
| Mean | 20.0% | 9.3% |
| Median | 14.5% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.6% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bhutanese (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |