Laotian vs British Male Poverty
COMPARE
Laotian
British
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Laotians
British
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs British Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,721,860 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,450,397 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | British |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 47.7% | 68.2% |
| Range | 46.9% | 65.4% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 16.5% |
| Median | 9.9% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and British by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Portuguese (10.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (10.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |